以下为 HarmonyOS 5应用防反编译能力测试的完整ArkTS实现方案,包含代码混淆检测、反编译防护验证和安全加固测试的代码示例:
1. 反编译防护架构
2. 基础防护检测
2.1 代码混淆检测
// obfuscation-checker.ets
import { DexAnalyzer } from '@ohos.security';
export function checkObfuscationLevel() {
const analyzer = new DexAnalyzer('build/outputs/dex');
const results = analyzer.analyze({
minClassLength: 3, // 类名最短长度
minMethodLength: 2, // 方法名最短长度
reservedKeywords: ['main', 'init'] // 应被混淆的关键字
});
return {
obfuscationRate: results.obfuscatedCount / results.totalCount,
exposedClasses: results.exposedClasses
};
}
2.2 字符串加密检测
// string-encryption.ets
import { StringScanner } from '@ohos.security';
export function findPlaintextSecrets() {
const secrets = [
'API_KEY',
'DB_PASSWORD',
'SECRET_SALT'
];
return StringScanner.scanFiles('src/**/*.ets', {
patterns: secrets,
minEntropy: 4.5 // 最小信息熵阈值
});
}
3. 原生库防护测试
3.1 SO库加固验证
// native-check.ets
import { ELFAnalyzer } from '@ohos.security';
export function verifyNativeProtection() {
const analyzer = new ELFAnalyzer('lib/arm64-v8a');
return {
hasAntiDebug: analyzer.checkSection('.antidebug'),
hasCodeSign: analyzer.checkSignature(),
hasObfuscation: analyzer.checkSymbolsObfuscated()
};
}
3.2 JNI调用混淆检测
// jni-check.ets
export function checkJNIVulnerabilities() {
const jniMethods = CodeAnalyzer.findJNIMethods();
return jniMethods.filter(method =>
method.isExported &&
!method.isObfuscated
);
}
4. 动态防护测试
4.1 调试器检测
// debugger-detector.ets
import { Process } from '@ohos.process';
export function checkDebuggerAttached() {
return Process.isDebuggerConnected() ||
Process.hasTracerPid();
}
// 防护实现
if (checkDebuggerAttached()) {
Process.selfDestruct('Debugger detected');
}
4.2 内存篡改检测
// memory-guard.ets
export class MemoryGuard {
private static SIGNATURE = 0xDEADBEEF;
static protect(key: string) {
const ptr = Memory.getAddress(key);
Memory.writeInt(ptr, this.SIGNATURE);
setInterval(() => {
if (Memory.readInt(ptr) !== this.SIGNATURE) {
Process.terminate('Memory tampered');
}
}, 1000);
}
}
5. 反编译模拟测试
5.1 APK伪编译测试
// apk-decompiler.ets
import { ApkTool } from '@ohos.security';
export async function simulateDecompile() {
const decompiler = new ApkTool('build/outputs/app.hap');
const result = await decompiler.run({
tools: ['jadx', 'apktool'],
timeout: 60_000
});
return {
success: result.success,
extracted: result.files.filter(f =>
f.type === 'java' || f.type === 'resource'
),
timeCost: result.timeCost
};
}
5.2 关键逻辑暴露分析
// logic-exposure.ets
export function analyzeExposedLogic(decompiled: string[]) {
const sensitivePatterns = [
'authToken',
'encryptionKey',
'licenseCheck'
];
return decompiled.flatMap(file =>
sensitivePatterns.filter(pattern =>
file.includes(pattern)
)
);
}
6. 安全加固方案
6.1 代码混淆配置
// proguard-rules.pro
-keep class com.example.security.** { *; }
-optimizationpasses 5
-overloadaggressively
-repackageclasses ''
-allowaccessmodification
6.2 原生层加固
# build.gradle
android {
externalNativeBuild {
cmake {
arguments '-DENABLE_LLVM_OBFUSCATION=ON'
}
}
}
7. 自动化测试套件
7.1 防护测试用例
// security-test.ets
import { describe, it } from '@ohos.test';
describe('反编译防护测试', () => {
it('代码混淆率应大于90%', () => {
const { obfuscationRate } = checkObfuscationLevel();
expect(obfuscationRate).toBeGreaterThan(0.9);
});
it('不应存在明文密钥', () => {
const secrets = findPlaintextSecrets();
expect(secrets).toHaveLength(0);
});
it('动态调试应触发防护', () => {
mockDebuggerAttach();
expect(() => checkDebuggerAttached()).toThrow();
});
});
7.2 持续集成配置
# .github/workflows/anti-reverse.yml
name: Anti-Reverse Test
on: [push]
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: huawei/anti-reverse-action@v1
with:
tools: jadx,apktool
timeout: 120s
8. 安全评分模型
| 检测项 | 权重 | 达标要求 |
|---|---|---|
| 代码混淆率 | 30% | ≥90% |
| 字符串加密 | 20% | 零明文敏感信息 |
| 动态调试防护 | 25% | 100%触发 |
| 原生库加固 | 25% | 通过所有检测项 |
9. 常见加固方案
| 漏洞类型 | 防护措施 | 代码示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 反编译暴露逻辑 | 控制流扁平化 | -obfuscation-flatten true |
| 内存注入攻击 | 内存校验签名 | MemoryGuard.protect() |
| 动态调试 | 反调试检测 | checkDebuggerAttached() |
| SO库逆向 | LLVM混淆 | -DENABLE_LLVM_OBFUSCATION |
10. 完整防护工作流
// security-workflow.ets
export async function runProtectionTests() {
// 静态分析
const obfuscation = checkObfuscationLevel();
const secrets = findPlaintextSecrets();
// 动态测试
const nativeCheck = verifyNativeProtection();
const decompileResult = await simulateDecompile();
// 生成报告
return {
score: calculateSecurityScore(
obfuscation, secrets, nativeCheck, decompileResult
),
details: {
obfuscation,
exposedSecrets: secrets,
nativeProtection: nativeCheck,
decompileTime: decompileResult.timeCost
}
};
}
通过本方案可实现:
- 90%+ 代码混淆覆盖率
- 零 敏感信息明文暴露
- 实时 动态调试防护
- 企业级 反编译抵抗能力