持续创作,加速成长!这是我参与「掘金日新计划 · 10 月更文挑战」的第30天,点击查看活动详情
活锁
基本介绍
两个线程互相改变对方的结束条件,导致最后谁也没办法结束
代码示例
两个线程t1 t2 一个成员变量count=10,t1线程的结束条件是count<=0,t2线程的结束条件是count>=20,但是t1线程是在不断减少count,t2线程是在不断增加count,最终导致两个线程动达不到结束条件 导致活锁
public class TestLiveLock {
static volatile int count = 10;
static final Object lock = new Object();
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Thread(() -> {
// 期望减到 0 退出循环
while (count > 0) {
sleep(0.2);
count--;
log.debug("count: {}", count);
}
}, "t1").start();
new Thread(() -> {
// 期望超过 20 退出循环
while (count < 20) {
sleep(0.2);
count++;
log.debug("count: {}", count);
}
}, "t2").start();
}
}
结果:
- 一直运行,数值保持在0~20期间
解决方法:
- 把两个线程指令执行的时间进行交错就行了,具体就是暂停时间改为随机
饥饿
基本介绍
多个线程中 有一个线程t,由于线程之间的冲突 导致t线程分的时间片低,导致t线程基本不运行,这种情况下t线程就处于饥饿
代码示例
我们前面遇见了死锁-哲学家问题,这个问题可以通过 顺序加锁的方法解决,但是这个方法会导致饥饿
public class TestDeadLock {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Chopstick c1 = new Chopstick("1");
Chopstick c2 = new Chopstick("2");
Chopstick c3 = new Chopstick("3");
Chopstick c4 = new Chopstick("4");
Chopstick c5 = new Chopstick("5");
new Philosopher("苏格拉底", c1, c2).start();
new Philosopher("柏拉图", c2, c3).start();
new Philosopher("亚里士多德", c3, c4).start();
new Philosopher("赫拉克利特", c4, c5).start();
new Philosopher("阿基米德", c1, c5).start();
}
}
@Slf4j(topic = "c.Philosopher")
class Philosopher extends Thread {
Chopstick left;
Chopstick right;
public Philosopher(String name, Chopstick left, Chopstick right) {
super(name);
this.left = left;
this.right = right;
}
@Override
public void run() {
while (true) {
// 尝试获得左手筷子
synchronized (left) {
// 尝试获得右手筷子
synchronized (right) {
eat();
}
}
}
}
Random random = new Random();
private void eat() {
log.debug("eating...");
Sleeper.sleep(0.5);
}
}
class Chopstick {
String name;
public Chopstick(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "筷子{" + name + '}';
}
}
结果:
- 02:32:24.639 c.Philosopher [阿基米德] - eating…
- 02:32:24.639 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:25.149 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:25.658 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:26.168 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:26.168 c.Philosopher [阿基米德] - eating…
- 02:32:26.678 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:26.678 c.Philosopher [阿基米德] - eating…
- 02:32:27.188 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:27.697 c.Philosopher [阿基米德] - eating…
- 02:32:27.697 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:28.207 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:28.717 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:29.226 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:29.736 c.Philosopher [阿基米德] - eating…
- 02:32:29.736 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:30.246 c.Philosopher [阿基米德] - eating…
- 02:32:30.246 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:30.756 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:31.265 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:31.775 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:31.775 c.Philosopher [阿基米德] - eating…
- 02:32:32.285 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:32.795 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:33.304 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:33.814 c.Philosopher [亚里士多德] - eating…
- 02:32:34.324 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:34.833 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:35.343 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:35.853 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:36.363 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
- 02:32:36.872 c.Philosopher [赫拉克利特] - eating…
解释:
观察下面两张图
我们通过顺序加锁 解决了死锁问题,但也同时使得 阿基米德竞争加大获得两个筷子的概率大大下降 使得赫拉克利特竞争减小获得两个筷子的概率大大增强,也就是最终结果显示的那样。
阿基米德现在的这种情况就被成为饥饿。