前端刷题路-Day14|刷题打卡

419 阅读2分钟

掘金团队号上线,助你 Offer 临门! 点击 查看详情

有效的数独(题号36)

题目

判断一个 9x9 的数独是否有效。只需要根据以下规则,验证已经填入的数字是否有效即可。

数字 1-9 在每一行只能出现一次。
数字 1-9 在每一列只能出现一次。
数字 1-9 在每一个以粗实线分隔的 3x3 宫内只能出现一次。

数独部分空格内已填入了数字,空白格用 '.' 表示。

示例 1:

输入:  
[    ["5","3",".",".","7",".",".",".","."],  
  ["6",".",".","1","9","5",".",".","."],  
  [".","9","8",".",".",".",".","6","."],  
  ["8",".",".",".","6",".",".",".","3"],  
  ["4",".",".","8",".","3",".",".","1"],  
  ["7",".",".",".","2",".",".",".","6"],  
  [".","6",".",".",".",".","2","8","."],  
  [".",".",".","4","1","9",".",".","5"],  
  [".",".",".",".","8",".",".","7","9"]  
]  
输出: true

示例 2:

输入:  
[    ["8","3",".",".","7",".",".",".","."],  
  ["6",".",".","1","9","5",".",".","."],  
  [".","9","8",".",".",".",".","6","."],  
  ["8",".",".",".","6",".",".",".","3"],  
  ["4",".",".","8",".","3",".",".","1"],  
  ["7",".",".",".","2",".",".",".","6"],  
  [".","6",".",".",".",".","2","8","."],  
  [".",".",".","4","1","9",".",".","5"],  
  [".",".",".",".","8",".",".","7","9"]  
]  
输出: false
解释: 除了第一行的第一个数字从 5 改为 8 以外,空格内其他数字均与 示例1 相同。
     但由于位于左上角的 3x3 宫内有两个 8 存在, 因此这个数独是无效的。

说明:

  • 一个有效的数独(部分已被填充)不一定是可解的。
  • 只需要根据以上规则,验证已经填入的数字是否有效即可。
  • 给定数独序列只包含数字 1-9 和字符'.'
  • 给定数独永远是 9x9 形式的。

链接

leetcode-cn.com/problems/va…

解释

这一题其实一眼看上去就直到解法了,问题在于具体怎么去实现。

主要就是找到行、列块的数组,判断里面有无重复数据

自己的答案(数组去重)

function removeDot(arr) {
  return arr.filter(item => item !== '.')
}
function isTurely(arr) {
  return arr.length === Array.from(new Set(arr)).length
}

var isValidSudoku = function(board) {
  for (let i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
    var rowArr = board[i]    
    if (!isTurely(removeDot(rowArr))) return false
    var cloArr = board.map(item => item[i])
    if (!isTurely(removeDot(cloArr))) return false
    if ([1, 2, 3].indexOf((i + 1) / 3) >= 0) {
      var startI = ((i  + 1) / 3 - 1) * 3
          endI = startI + 3
      for (let j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
        var startJ = j * 3
            endJ = startJ + 3
            arr = []
        while (startJ < endJ) {
          arr = arr.concat(board[startJ].slice(startI, endI))
          startJ++
        }
        if (!isTurely(removeDot(arr))) return false
      }    
    }
  }
  return true
};

想法比较简单,找到行列块的数据后,往里面插入数据,插入数据后进行数组去重,如果去重后的结果和去重前的数组长度不一,那就GG,显然是有重复的。这里的问题就出在判断条件上,例用数组去重来判断是比较吃性能的一种行为。

自己的答案(Map、Set)

var isValidSudoku = function(board) {
  var newMap = new Map()
  for (let i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
    for (let j = 0; j < 9; j++) {
      var boardValue = board[i][j]
      if (boardValue !== '.') {
        var mapNameArr = [`line-${i}`, `row-${j}`, `${parseInt(i / 3)}-${parseInt(j / 3)}`]
        for (let k = 0; k < mapNameArr.length; k++) {
          var mapName = mapNameArr[k]
          var mapRes = newMap.get(mapName)
          if (mapRes) {
            if (mapRes.has(boardValue)) return false
            mapRes.add(boardValue)
            newMap.set(mapName, mapRes)
          } else {
            newMap.set(mapName, new Set([boardValue]))
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
  return true
};

这其实是我看了一些解答之后自己又写的答案,有参考的嫌疑。

首先和第一种解法做比较,很容易看出来其实这里去掉了两个额外的函数,因为判断条件写在内部了。

接下来直接循环两次1~9,比上面的循环看上去更简单一些,重点是例用二维数组的特性。之后在循环内部拿到行列块数值,放到Set中进行比较,如果存在,直接GG,不存在就添加进去,确实方便了不少,而且Map和Set还有性能优势,不过由于生成的变量较多,空间复杂度有待改善。

更好的方法(分开校验)

/**
 * @param {character[][]} board
 * @return {boolean}
 */
var isValidSudoku = function(board) {
    const mapRow = new Map(), mapColum = new Map()
    for (let i = 0; i < 9; i++) { // 先把横竖验了
        mapRow.clear()
        mapColum.clear()
        for (let j = 0; j < 9; j++) {
            if (mapRow.has(board[i][j])) return false
            if (mapColum.has(board[j][i])) return false
            if (board[i][j] !== '.') {
                mapRow.set(board[i][j], j)
            }
            if (board[j][i] !== '.') {
                mapColum.set(board[j][i], i)
            }
        }
    }
    const map = new Map()
    let m = 0, n = 0
    while (m < 9) { // 开始验块状
        while (n < 9) {
            map.clear()
            for (let i = m; i < m + 3; i++) {
                for (j = n; j < n + 3; j++) {
                    if (map.has(board[i][j])) return false
                    if (board[i][j] !== '.') {
                        map.set(board[i][j], j)
                    }
                }
            }
            n += 3
        }
        m += 3
        n = 0
    }
    return true
};

从时间复杂度和空间复杂度来说这确实可以说是比较优秀的一种解法了,二者都位居上游。

这里先利用两层for循环来校验行和列,校验完成后再使用while来对块进行校验,也是两层for循环,单由于循环次数较少,性能也是比较好的,每次只用循环当前的9个数据,很棒的一种解法。

并且它没有采用像我一样在Map中使用Set的方法,同一时间段数据量没有特别大,读写应该会更快些,值得学习



PS:想查看往期文章和题目可以点击下面的链接:

这里是按照日期分类的👇

前端刷题路-目录(日期分类)

经过有些朋友的提醒,感觉也应该按照题型分类
这里是按照题型分类的👇

前端刷题路-目录(题型分类)

有兴趣的也可以看看我的个人主页👇

Here is RZ